Journal of Hydraulics

Journal of Hydraulics

Developed Three-dimensional model for extracting stage-discharge relationship in straight multi-stage compound channels

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 PHD Student in Water and Hydraulic Structure Engineering at Shahrood University
2 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Civil & Environmental Eng., Shahroud University
3 Water Engineering Department, Gorgan University of agricu
10.30482/jhyd.2023.413507.1670
Abstract
Developed Three-dimensional model for extract stage-discharge relationship in straight multi-stage compound channels
ABSTRACT
Introduction
In natural rivers and certain urban channels, when flood events occur, the flow diverts from the main channel and inundates the surrounding floodplains. These particular configurations are termed compound channels. Floodplains can exhibit both symmetrical and asymmetrical patterns. Depending on geometric factors, lateral slope, and differences in elevation, multiple floodplains can manifest on each side of the main channel. These intricate structures are known as multi-stage compound channels. Multi-stage compound channels not only possess enhanced flow conveyance capabilities compared to simpler classic compound channels but also their second or third floodplains may offer prospects for recreational utilization or landscape enhancement within urban settings. Historically, the examination of flow parameters and the computation of conveyance capacities for compound sections were carried out using conventional methodologies, such as divided channel methods and traditional flow resistance equations like Manning, Chezy, Darcy-Weisbach, and others. However, these approaches often disregarded the momentum exchange arising from interactions between the main channel and floodplains, as well as the impact of secondary flows. Consequently, the estimated flow rates for compound sections tended to be higher than actual values. Sellin (1964) played a pioneering role in acknowledging the interaction between the main channel and floodplains, laying the groundwork for subsequent investigations into the evolution of conventional techniques. In contrast to the extensive research on classic compound channels, multi-stage compound channels have received limited attention and exploration in the scientific literature.
Methodology
In this research, a numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using the finite volume method and The RNG k-ε turbulence model has been employed to simulate various hydraulic characteristics of multi-stage compound channels. These characteristics encompass the three-dimensional flow pattern, distribution of transverse velocity, secondary flows, turbulence energy, and the stage-discharge relationship. The RNG k-ε turbulence model is adept at reproducing rotational flows and large vortices, addressing the limitations of the standard k-ε model in representing non-circular channels at corner locations and rotational flows.
To verify the validity of this mathematical model, laboratory data obtained from a channel with a three-stage asymmetric rectangular compound section (Singh, 2021) were utilized. The experimentation carried out in a channel featuring a main section width of 0.445 meters. On one side of the main section, two floodplains of widths 10 and 20 centimeters were established. The bed of the main channel was constructed using glass, while the bed of the first and second floodplains were covered with a uniform layer of syntetic grass to introduce channel roughness.The channel itself is 20 meters in length, with a longitudinal slope of 0.003. The total height and width of the channel are 0.5 and 0.745 meters, respectively. The bankful height is set at 0.0425 meters. The flow rate within this channel varies between 20 and 60 liters per second.
Results and discussion
Overall, the comparison of the three-dimensional model's computational results with experimental data in terms of the positions and values of maximum and minimum velocities indicates the satisfactory accuracy of the proposed mathematical model in this study.
The turbulence intensity and momentum exchange at the interface between the first and second floodplains are lower compared to the interface between the main channel and the first floodplain. This discrepancy is attributed to the greater velocity difference at the interface plane of the main channel and the first floodplain. The influence of secondary currents at the main channel and first floodplain interface diminishes as the water level rises. However, significant secondary currents persist at the boundary between the first and second floodplains across all investigated relative depths. This underscores the significance of flow dispersion in contrast to convection in the second floodplain, particularly in cases of shallow relative depths.The highest flow velocity is observed at the midpoint of the main channel, inclined toward its right wall, situated far from the channel bed and close to the water surface. The computed transverse profiles of stream-wise velocity are satisfactorily accurate in both the main channel and floodplains (especially the second floodplain). Nevertheless, the modeling error is relatively notable at the interface of the main channel and the first floodplain. Predicting flow discharge for this channel using the mathematical model yields an average error of approximately 3.9% and a maximum error of 6.2%.
Conclusion
Due to the lack of experimental data on height and width variations of the second floodplain and their impact on flow characteristics, expressing the effects of these conditions is challenging. Further research involving precise laboratory measurements is required to comprehensively understand the influence of these changes.
Considering that one of the applications of multi-stage compound channel is in urban areas and the first floodplain has a smaller width and is designed with the aim of increasing the channel conveyance capacity, and the second floodplain is intended to beautify the urban landscape and use it as a recreational and tourism environment. Therefore, it usually has tree vegetation. In addition to creating high shear stresses in the bed of the second floodplain, this causes high energy loss and a significant decrease in the conveyance capacity of the multi-stage compound channel. Therefore, it is recommended to design rivers or manmade flood control channels in the urban areas in the form of multi-stage compound channels so that the first floodplain is to be significantly increase the conveyance capacity of the channel and the second floodplain is for urban and public landscapes. This provides nearby people to escape from the danger zone during severe urban floods.
Key words: finite volume method,quick method, RNG K-ε, multi-stage compound channel, stage-discharge relationship
Keywords

Subjects


Ackers, P. (1991). The hydraulic design of straight compound channels. Vol. 1, Report SR 281, HR Wallingford.
Ackers, P. (1993). Flow formulae for straight two-stage channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 31(4), 509-531.
Al-Khatib, I.A., Abaza, K.A. & Fkhidah, I.A. (2014). Prediction of zonal and total discharges in smooth straight prismatic compound channels using regression modeling. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 38, 40-48.
Ayyoubzadeh, S.A. (1997). Hydraulic aspects of straight-compound channel flow and bed load sediment transport. PhD Diss., University of Birmingham.
Azamathulla, H.M. & Zahiri, A. (2012). Flow discharge prediction in compound channels using linear genetic programming. Journal of Hydrology, 454, 203-207.
Bousmar, D. & Zech, Y. (1999). Momentum transfer for practical flow computation in compound channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(7), 696-706.
Chen, G., Zhao, S., Huai, W. & Gu, S. (2019). General model for stage–discharge prediction in multi-stage compound channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 57(4), 517-533.
Conway, P., O'Sullivan, J.J. & Lambert, M.F. (2013). Stage–discharge prediction in straight compound channels using 3D numerical models. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 166(1), 3-15.
Fischer-Antze, T., Stoesser, T., Bates, P. & Olsen, N. (2001). 3D numerical modelling of open-channel flow with submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 39(3), 303-310.
Gibson, M.M. & Spalding, D.B. (1972). A two-equation model of turbulence applied to the prediction of heat and mass transfer in wall boundary layers. A1ChE-ASME Heat Transfer Conf, ASME Publication 72-HT-15, 1-8, New York.
James, C.S., Wark, J.B. & Ackers, P. (1994). Design of straight and meandering compound channels, NRA R&D Report 13, RR, Wallingford, UK.
Jazizadeh, F. & Zarrati, A. (2008). Development of a three-dimensional numerical model to solve shallow-water equations in compound channels. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35(9), 963-974.
Keller, R. & Rodi, W. (1988). Prediction of flow characteristics in main channel/flood plain flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 26(4), 425-441.
Kordi, H., Amini, R., Zahiri, A. & Kordi, E. (2015). Improved Shiono and Knight method for overflow modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(12), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.000123.
Krishnappan, B.G. & Lau, Y.L. (1986). Turbulence modeling of flood plain flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 112(4), 251-266.
Lambert, M. & Sellin, R. (1996). Discharge prediction in straight compound channels using the mixing length concept. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 34(3), 381-394.
Launder, B.E. & Spalding, D.B. (1972). Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. Academic Press, 169p.
Launder, B.E. & Spalding, D.B. (1983). The numerical computation of turbulent flows. In: Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion, 96-116, Elsevier.
Leonard, B.P. (1979). A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 19(1), 59-98.
Limerinos, J.T. (1970). Determination of the Manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels, 1898-B. US Government Printing Office Washington, DC.
Najafyan, S., Yonesi, H., Parsai, A. & Torabi-Poude, H. (2016). Physical and Numerical Modeling of Flow in Heterogeneous Roughness Non-Prismatic Compound Open Channel. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 17(66), 87-104. (In Persian)
Najafzadeh, M. & Zahiri, A. (2015). Neuro-fuzzy GMDH-based evolutionary algorithms to predict flow discharge in straight compound channels. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(12), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001 185.
Nezu, I., Tominaga, A. & Nakagawa, H. (1993). Field measurements of secondary currents in straight rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(5), 598-614.
Ng, K.H., & Spalding, D.B. (1983). Turbulence model for boundary layers near walls. Physics of Fluids, 15(1), 20-30.
Othman, F. & Valentine, E.M. (2006). Numerical modelling of the velocity distribution in a compound channel. J. Hydrol. Hydromech, 54(3), 269-279.
Parsaei, A. & Haghiabi, A.H. (2015). Hydraulic analysis of compound open channel. Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 2(1), 137-142.
Parsaie, A. & Haghiabi, A.H. (2017). Improving modelling of discharge coefficient of triangular labyrinth lateral weirs using SVM, GMDH and MARS techniques. Irrigation and drainage, 66(4), 636-654.
Patankar, S.V. (1980). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publ. Corp., New York, 214p.
Rodi, W. (1980). Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics-A state-of-the-art. IAHR Publication, DELFT, The Netherlands.
Rodi, W. & Spalding, D.B. (1970). A two-parameter model of turbulence, and its application to free jets. Wärme-und Stoffübertragung, 3(2), 85-95.
Sahu, M., Khatua, K. & Mahapatra, S. (2011). A neural network approach for prediction of discharge in straight compound open channel flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 22(5), 438-446.
Sellin, R.H.J. (1964). A laboratory investigation into the interaction between the flow in the channel of a river and that over its flood plain. La Houille Blanche, Grenoble, France, 7, 793-802.
Shiono, K. & Knight, D. (1988). Two-dimensional analytical solution for a compound channel. Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on refined flow modelling and turbulence measurements, Tokyo, Japan, 26-28 July 1988, 503-510.
Shiono, K. & Knight, D.W. (1991). Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 222, 617-646.
Singh, P.K. (2021). Experimental study on the flow structure of asymmetric compound channels. PhD Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, University of Liverpool, China, 311p.
Spalding, D. (1983). Heat transfer from turbulent separated flows. In: Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion, 9-21, Elsevier.
Thomas, T. & Williams, J. (1995). Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an asymmetric compound open channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 33(1), 27-41.
Tominaga, A. & Nezu, I. (1991). Turbulent structure in compound open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(1), 21-41.
Unal, B., Mamak, M., Seckin, G. & Cobaner, M. (2010). Comparison of an ANN approach with 1-D and 2-D methods for estimating discharge capacity of straight compound channels. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(2), 120-129.
Versteeg, H.K. & Malalasekera, W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method, Pearson education., England, 503p.
Vreugdenhil, C.B. (1994). Numerical methods for shallow-water flow, Vol. 13. Water Science and Technology Library, Springer Dordrecht, 262p.
Wang, W., Huai, W.-X. & Gao, M. (2014). Numerical investigation of flow through vegetated multi-stage compound channel. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 26(3), 467-473.
Yakhot, V. & Orszag, S.A. (1986). Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1(1), 3-51.
Zahiri, A. & Azamathulla, H.M. (2014). Comparison between linear genetic programming and M5 tree models to predict flow discharge in compound channels. Neural Computing and Applications, 24(2), 413-420

  • Receive Date 01 September 2023
  • Revise Date 20 September 2023
  • Accept Date 27 September 2023