Berm breakwaters are structures that reshape under waves action and reach to a stable profile. In this type of breakwaters the units of the armor layer are allowed to move in order to take a final form without changing the serviceability performance of the structure. The remaining berm width - after rescission - is the main criterion for stability of these structures. If the rescission become more than the initial berm width, the breakwater will be unstable and failure will occur. In this paper the effect of nominal diameter on stability of reshaping berm breakwaters is investigated by experimental studies. In order to consider the effect of this parameter in comparison with other parameters, 120 tests have been carried out in the wave flume of Tarbiat Modares University Hydraulic Laboratory. The waves in all tests are irregular waves conforming JONSWAP spectral energy. The amount of is assumed for graining. Results indicate that water depth has a considerable effect on berm rescission comparing to nominal diameter. However, the initial berm width has the same effect as nominal diameter. The results also show that by raising the position of berm to water level, rescission effect is reduced. On the other hand by decreasing nominal diameter and increasing the initial berm width the same percentage of rescission could be expected.
Shafieefar, M., & Motalebi, A. (2011). Effect of Nominal Stone Diameter on Stability of Reshaping Berm Breakwaters. Journal of Hydraulics, 6(2), 1-14. doi: 10.30482/jhyd.2011.85492
MLA
M. Shafieefar; A. Motalebi. "Effect of Nominal Stone Diameter on Stability of Reshaping Berm Breakwaters". Journal of Hydraulics, 6, 2, 2011, 1-14. doi: 10.30482/jhyd.2011.85492
HARVARD
Shafieefar, M., Motalebi, A. (2011). 'Effect of Nominal Stone Diameter on Stability of Reshaping Berm Breakwaters', Journal of Hydraulics, 6(2), pp. 1-14. doi: 10.30482/jhyd.2011.85492
VANCOUVER
Shafieefar, M., Motalebi, A. Effect of Nominal Stone Diameter on Stability of Reshaping Berm Breakwaters. Journal of Hydraulics, 2011; 6(2): 1-14. doi: 10.30482/jhyd.2011.85492