Journal of Hydraulics

Journal of Hydraulics

Sensitivity analysis of the Stage-discharge parameters using the concept of isovel contours

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Civil eng department, University of Sistan and Baluchestan
2 Civil Engineering Department, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
3 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Abstract
Introduction
In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate discharge. A practical approach in this regard is to evaluate the discharge at different water levels using the available information on a reference water level. Using the stage-discharge curve, the discharge rate at other levels can be predicted and evaluated if the discharge is known at one surface level. Maghrebi et al. presented a method to determine the stage-discharge relationship.This relationship compares the discharge at two different levels of a cross-section. Therefore, using the discharge collected at level i as reference point, the discharge values at other levels can be evaluated. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of changing these powers on the discharge evaluation error.

Methodology
A reasonable value for the powers must first be considered to investigate the effect of changing the stage-discharge relationship’s powers on the amount of discharge evaluation error. Then, in different examples, coding should be done so that the powers are changed and for each power, the discharge evaluation error is calculated and reported separately. Then, it is checked whether the error has been reduced or not. The error relations and the Maghrebi relation are coded in MATLAB software for the cross-section of Figure 2. The discharge Flow evaluation error values for FCF-Series 10 were calculated separately for the levels specified in Figure 3 by considering the interval [-2,2] for each power of the Maghrebi relationship and its changes are shown in Figures 5 to 10. In these figures, the horizontal dashed line shows the error value in Maghrebi relation to evaluate discharge.



Results and Discussion
In Figures 5 to 10, the reduction of the discharge evaluation error can be seen in some ranges of the power change interval. The maximum error reduction can be seen in Figure 10, Case C, which shows a reduction of about 4%. The error reduction ranges are given in Table 3.
Figures 5 to 10 and the results presented in Table 3 show that it is possible to improve the performance of the Maghrebi relation by changing the relationship powers within the suggested range. On the other hand, it was stated earlier that up to a 4% reduction in discharge evaluation error can be achieved.
Conclusion
Finally, this study provides a suggested range for each power. The most important result of the present article is that changing the powers of the stage-discharge relation can reduce the discharge evaluation error. The results show that changing the powers reduce the discharge evaluation error by more than 5%.
Keywords

Subjects


Abril, J.B. & Knight, D.W. (2004). Stage-discharge prediction for rivers in flood applying a depth-averaged model. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42, 616-629.
Aronica, G., Hankin, B. & Beven, K.(1998). Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data, Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 349–365.
Chen, C. (1991). Unified theory on power laws for flow resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117, 371-389. 
Hsu, M.H., Fu, J.C. & Liu, W.C. (2006). Dynamic routing model with real-time roughness updating for flood forecasting. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering
, 132(6), 605-619.
Jamifar, F., Pirzadeh, B. & Maghrebi, M.F. (2020). Uncertainty analysis of stage-discharge curve in natural rivers, 19th Iranian Hydraulic Conf., Mashhad. (In Persian)
Knight, D. (1992). SERC flood channel facility experimental data phase A. Hydraulic Research Wallingford, Wallingford, UK Report SR314.
Knight, D.W. & Demetriou, J.D. (1983). Flood plain and main channel flow interaction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(8), https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:8(1073).
Knight, D.W., Hazlewood, C., Lamb, R. & Samuels, P.G. (2018). Practical channel hydraulics: Roughness, conveyance and afflux. CRC Press.
Maghrebi, M.F. (2006). Application of the single point measurement in discharge estimation, Advances in Water Resources, 29, 1504-1514.
Maghrebi, M., Kavousizadeh, A., Maghrebi, R. & Ahmadi, A. (2017). Stage–discharge estimation in straight compound channels using isovel contours, Hydrol. Process., 31(22), 3859–3870.
Mohammadi, M. & Maghrebi, M.F. (2023). Estimating stage-discharge curves in unsteady flows using the concept of isovel contours in natural rivers, Journal of Hydraulics, 18(2), 1-20,
Montanari, A. (2005). Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 41(8), 1–13.
Rahimpour, M. & Maghrebi, M.F. (2005). Application of a new method discharge estimation in rectangular channels with non-uniform roughness, 5th Iranian Hydraulic Conf., Kerman. (In Persian)
Rahimpour, M. & Maghrebi, M.F. (2006). Prediction of stage–discharge curves in
open-channels using a fixed-point velocity measurement. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 17, 276-281.
Vatanchi, S. & Maghrebi, MF. (2018). Investigation accuracy of Manning's roughness coefficient in estimating stage-discharge curve using the consept of isovel contours, 17th Iranian Hydraulic Conf., Shahrekord. (In Persian)
Vrugt, J., Gupta, J., Bouten, W. & Sorooshian S. (2003). A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2002WR001642.
Yen, B.C. (2002). Open channel flow resistance. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 128, 20-39.

  • Receive Date 13 September 2024
  • Revise Date 08 November 2024
  • Accept Date 23 December 2024