Journal of Hydraulics

Journal of Hydraulics

Characteristics of secondary currents and flow field in non-prismatic compound channels with vegetative cover

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2 Department of civil engineering, science and research branch, Islamic azad university, Tehran, Iran
3 Dep. of Water Eng. ,Lorestan university
4 Assistant Professor, kharazmi University
Abstract
Introduction:
During floods in many Rivers, the flow exits its main section and inundates the vicinity floodplains. The hydraulic flow in compound sections differs significantly from single channels. In such conditions, due to the change in flow section shape and the roughness difference between the main channel and floodplains, the flow structure in compound channels becomes highly complex (Yang et al., 2007; 2013). Vegetation in natural rivers is typically classified into rigid (trees) and flexible (grasses) plant. The stems of flexible plants can change shape with the movement of water flow, whereas the trunks of rigid trees remain unchanged against the flow without deformation (Terrier, 2010). The vegetation of floodplain is one of the main components that can influence the velocity distribution in compound channels (samadi Rahim et al., 2021; Hamidifar et al., 2016). this study, has investigated the flow field and the formation of secondary currents resulting from rigid and flexible vegetation in divergence compound channels with a mobile bed.
Methodology:
In order to investigate the effect of the vegetation of floodplain on the flow structure and the formation of secondary currents, solid cylindrical plastic rods with a diameter (D) of 10 mm were used to model the vegetation of trees and artificial grass with a height of 3 cm as flexible vegetation on They were placed in floodplains with a width of 0.36 cm. The distance between the rows of rods (lx) was considered constant and equal to 75 mm. While in order to change the vegetation density, the transverse distance between two rods (ly) was set at three distances of 50, 75 and 100 mm. In the main channel with a width of 0.24 meters and a height of 0.15 meters, siliceous sediments with a mean diameter (D50) of 1 mm created a mobile bed. In the floodplain, three divergence angles of 3.8, 5.7 and 11.3 degrees were set in such a way that in three relative depths of flow equal to 0.25, 0.35 and 0.45 and three densities of vegetation with the space ratio to 5, 7.5 and 10 were performed in a total of 36 experiments. The components of the local velocity of the flow in the middle section and at the end of the divergence of floodplain were measured by the 3D velocimeter of the Vectrino Profiler.
Results and Discussion:
In the non-prismatic compound channels with vegetation, the vertical isovelocity in the common area between the main channel and the floodplain indicates a strong velocity gradient in this area and confirms the formation of a free shear layer due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz phenomenon. Due to the presence of grass vegetation in the floodplain bed, the flow in floodplain is divided into two separate regions: the flow within the grass vegetation and the flow top of the grass vegetation. In divergent compound sections without vegetation, the transverse velocity of the flow in the main channel and the floodplain is significant and its positive. In the presence of vegetation, because the crest of the dune has reached the middle range of the divergence reach, the vertical component of the velocity in the main channel has become negative. As the distance from the floodplain bed increases, the drag force caused by the trees dominates and the contribution of the bed roughness in controlling the flow decreases. Therefore, the velocity profile in floodplain does not follow the logarithmic distribution and almost assumes an S shape. Vegetation has caused the formation of very weak secondary currents in the floodplain, especially in the reach of the end of the divergence. Also, the increase in vegetation density has caused the strength of eddies to decrease in the the main channel. The transverse gradient shows that the greatest effect of the secondary currents was in the common area between the main channel and floodplain, so that the increase in vegetation density confirms the formation of a stronger shear layer in this area. Vegetation on the floodplain weakens the secondary currents in this area. These results agree well with the studies of researchers such as Yang et al. (2007), Hamidifar et al. (2016) and Samadi Rahim et al. (2023). Also, the movement of eddies direction is constantly changing and the flow is very complicated. Therefore, local erosion is observed in the bed of the main channel and close to the common side wall, and on the other side, the height of the dune is increased. While in the main channel, there are two eddies in opposite directions.


Conclusion:
The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability causes the generation of a free shear layer in the intersection area. Also, the formation of points with a velocity close to zero on the floodplains shows the existence of excessive resistance of flexible and rigid vegetation compared to literature. The periodic positive and negative values of the transverse flow velocity in the floodplain range indicate the interference of Von Kàrmàn vortex streets in the space between the two vegetation elements. In the divergent compound channel with the vegetated floodplain, too weak secondary currents are generated, especially in the end of the divergence reach.
Keywords

Subjects


Ackers, P. (1993). Flow Formulae for straight two-stage channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 31(4), 509-531.
Barrios-Piña, H., Ramírez-León, H., Rodríguez-Cuevas, C. & Couder-Castañeda, C. (2014). Multilayer numerical modeling of flows through vegetation using a mixing-length turbulence model. Water, 6(7), 2084-2103.
Cheng, N.S. & Nguyen, H.T. (2011). Hydraulic radius for evaluating resistance induced by simulated emergent vegetation in open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(9), 995-1004.
Devi, K. & Khatua, K.K. (2016). Prediction of depth averaged velocity and boundary shear distribution of a compound channel based on the mixing layer theory. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 50, 147-157.
Ghisalberti, M. & Nepf, H.M. (2006). The structure of the shear layer in flows over rigid and flexible canopies. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 6(3), 277–301.
Hamidifar, H., Omid, M.H. & Keshavarzi, A. (2016). Kinetic energy and momentum correction coefficients in straight compound channels with vegetated floodplain. Journal of Hydrology, 537, 10-17.
James, C.S., Goldbeck, U.K., Patini, A. & Jordanova, A.A. (2008). Influence of foliage on flow resistance of emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 46(4), 536-542.
Maturi, F., Behdarvandi Askar, M., Ansari Ghojghar, M. & Parsi, E. (2021). Experimental Study of the Effect of non-Submerged Rigid Vegetation on Flow Force in Symmetrical Rectangular Compound Channel by Direct Measurement Method. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(2), 439-450. (In Persian)
Mohseni, M. & Tavakoli Nezhad Allah Abadi, F. (2020). Experimental Study of Vertical velocity profiles in compound channels with vegetation on floodplains. Journal of Hydraulics, 15(4), 31-45. (In Persian)
Mulahasan, S., Stoesser, T. & McSherry, R. (2017). Effect of floodplain obstructions on the discharge conveyance capacity of compound channels. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 143(11), 04017045, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) IR.1943-4774.0001240.
Rezaei, B. & Knight, D.W. (2009). Application of the Shiono and Knight Method in compound channels with non-prismatic floodplains. Journal of hydraulic Research (IAHR), 47(6), 716-726.
Samadi Rahim, A., Yonesi, H.A., Rahimi, H.R., Shahinejad, B., Podeh, H.T. & Azamattulla, H.M. (2023). Effect of vegetation on flow hydraulics in compound open channels with non-prismatic floodplains. AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72(5), 781-797.
Samadi Rahim, A., Yonesi, H.A., Shahinejad, B., Podeh, H.T. & Azamattulla, H. M. (2022). Flow structures in asymmetric compound channels with emergent vegetation on divergent floodplain. Acta Geophysica, 70(5), 2403-2421.
Samadi Rahim, A., Yonesi, H., Shahinejad, B. & Torabi Podeh, H. (2021). Experimental investigation of floodplain vegetation density effect on flow hydraulic‎ in divergent compound channels. Journal of Hydraulics, 16(1), 111-130. (In Persian)
Sanjou, M. & Nezu, I. (2011). Turbulence structure and concentration exchange property in compound open-channel flows with emergent trees on the floodplain edge. International Journal of River Basin Management, 9(3-4), 181-193.
Sanjou, M., Nezu, I., Suzuki, S. & Itai, K. (2010). Turbulence structure of compound open-channel flows with one-line emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 22(1), 560-564.
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. (1968). Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.
Shahsavari, H., Khodashenas, S.R. & Esmaili, K. (2020). Investigating the effect of rigid non-submerged artificial vegetation on flow characteristics in Compound Meander Channel. Journal of Hydraulics, 15(2), 131-147. (In Persian)
Shiono K. & Knight, D.W. (1991). Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. J Fluid Mech, 222, 617–646.
Stephenson, D. & Kolovopoulos, P. (1990). Effects of momentum transfer in compound channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 116(12), 1512-1522.
Sun, X. & Shiono, K. (2009). Flow resistance of one-line emergent vegetation along the floodplain edge of a compound open channel. Advances in Water Resources, 32(3), 430-438.
Terrier, B. (2010). Flow characteristics in straight compound channels with vegetation along the main channel, Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University.
Terrier, B., Robinson, S., Shiono, K., Paquier, A. & Ishigaki, T. (2010). Influence of vegetation to boundary shear stress in open channel for overbank flow. River Flow 2010, 285-292.
Vojoudi Mehrabani, F., Mohammadi, M., Ayyoubzadeh, S.A., Fernandes, J. & Ferreira, R. (2020). Flow behavior in Non-Prismatic Convergent Compound Channel with Submerged Vegetation on Floodplains. Journal of Hydraulics, 15(1), 97-111. (In Persian)
Wang, W.J., Peng, W.Q., Huai, W.X., Katul, G.G., Liu, X.B., Qu, X.D. & Dong, F. (2019). Friction factor for turbulent open channel flow covered by vegetation. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5178, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41477-7.
Watanabe, T. & Kondo, J. (1990). The influence of canopy structure and density upon the mixing length within and above vegetation. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 68(2), 227-235.
 
Yang, K., Cao, S. & Knight, D.W. (2007). Flow patterns in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(2), 148-159.
Yang, K., Nie, R., Liu, X. & Cao, S. (2013). Modeling depth-averaged velocity and boundary shear stress in rectangular compound channels with secondary flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(1), 76-83.
Yonesi, H.A., Omid, M.H., & Ayyoubzadeh, S.A. (2019). Investigation of hydraulic flow and sediment transport in Non-prismatic compound channels. Journal of Hydraulics, 14(2), 89-104. (In Persian)
Zdravkovich, M.M. (1977). Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders in various arrangements. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 99, 618–633
Zdravkovich, M.M. (1987). The effects of interference between circular cylinders in cross flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1(2), 239-261.

  • Receive Date 31 March 2024
  • Revise Date 13 July 2024
  • Accept Date 03 August 2024