Numerical modeling for estimating the mean particle size and concentration of suspended sediments in rivers using the acoustic tomography method

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Master student, / College of Aburaihan - Tehran university

2 University of Tehran

3 Assistant Professor / Water Research Institute (WRI)

4 Assistant Professor /Water Research Institute (WRI)

Abstract

Introduction
Today, due to the high statistics of erosion globally, the importance of continuous monitoring of rivers that carry most of the eroded rich soil in the form of suspended sediments is vital. In Iran, almost one billion tons of eroded soil are destroyed annually. One hundred million cubic meters will reduce the volume of dams. In such a situation, most sediment measurement stations worldwide still use traditional methods to monitor suspended sediments, which are costly and time-consuming and are associated with human error. In recent decades, attention to new methods of monitoring suspended sediments in rivers has increased. One of these methods is Hydroacoustic technologies such as Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), which transmit sound waves with different frequencies underwater. The analysis of its speed and intensity and the number of sound waves attenuation due to collisions with suspended sediment particles can measure the mean suspended sediment concentration and particle size estimating the mean suspended sediment concentration using a single frequency is possible only by sampling the river. Therefore, in this study, for the first time, with the development of tomographic relationships and the simultaneous dual frequencies, the possibility of estimating the mean particle size and suspended sediment concentration in the river using the Fluvial Acoustic Tomography (FAT) method without the need for sampling by using 10 and 30 kHz are presented.
Material and Methods
The acoustic tomography consists of two sources of sound production and a sound receiver installed diagonally on both sides of the river; They monitor the river cross-section by sending and receiving sound waves. This system is considered an active measurement system due to its sound production source. The systems are synchronized using nanosecond satellites using GNU satellites and transmit sound waves at a single time. Sound waves propagate throughout the water depth, and changes in water depth do not affect the measurement of this method, and there is no need to install several devices at different depths. These waves propagate forward in contact with the water surface and the bed of the aquatic environment. One of the disadvantages of the acoustic tomography method is trapping the foliage of plants around the transducers, which disrupts the measurement operation (Bahreinimotlagh et al., 2019; Bahreinimotlagh et al., 2018; Bahreinimotlagh et al., 2015)
Result and discussion
In this study, to test the ability of the proposed equation in acoustic tomography, three hypothetical probabilities (A1, A2, and A3) were considered with SNR (36 and 23 dB), (39 and 26 dB), and (37 and 24 dB) respectively. First, by using the proposed equation, estimate the sediment absorption coefficient by using frequencies (10 and 30 kHz) as the hypothetical probability A1, A2, and, A3 are (0.013 and 0.025 dB), (0.009 and 0.020 dB) and, (0.011 and 0.023 decibels) respectively. Finally, by solving two equations and two unknowns for each hypothetical occurrence probability (A1, A2, and A3), the average concentration and size of suspended sediments in the river section are equal to (1.43 kg / m3 and 24.89 μm), (0.54 kg / m3 and 9.64 μm) and (0.93 kg / m3 and 16.43 μm) were estimated respectively.
In general, with increasing frequency, the measured SNR values decrease. The noise increases with increasing frequency, and the SNR decreases. Similarly, by reducing the SNR, the values of the sediment absorption coefficient also increase. It only could measure SNR between 10 and 40 dB.
Conclusion
This research showed that acoustic tomography could estimate PS and SSC with dual frequency using the proposed equation. The results showed that the acoustic tomography method could monitor suspended sediment particles with a radius between 105 to 0.1 μm and mean sediment concentrations between 7.17 to 0.1 kg/m3 at 10 and 30 kHz.
Keywords: Hydroacoustic, Sound waves, 10 kHz frequency, 30 kHz frequency, Acoustic Tomography.

Keywords


Al Sawaf, M.B. and Kawanisi, K. (2019). Novel high-frequency acoustic monitoring of streamflow-turbidity dynamics in a gravel-bed river during artificial dam flush. Catena, 172, 738-752.
Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K. and Zhu, X. (2015). Acoustic investigations of tidal bores in Qiantang River. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), 71(4), 139–144.
Bahreinimotlagh, M., Roozbahani, R., Eftekhari, M., Kardan Moghadam, H. and Kavousi Heydari, A.R. (2018). Design, manufacture and the evaluation of fluvial acoustic tomography system (FATS). Journal of Acoustical Engineering Society of Iran, 6(1), 1-11. (In Persian)
Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K., Al Sawaf, M.B., Roozbahani, R., Eftekhari, M. and Khoshuie, A.K. (2019). Continuous streamflow monitoring in shared watersheds using advanced underwater acoustic tomography system: a case study on Zayanderud River. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191(11), 1-9.
Bahrainimotlagh, M., Roozbehani, R., Eftekhari, M., and Hassanli, S.A.M. (2019). Investigation of acoustic technologies for monitoring flows in rivers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 8(15), 73-82. (In Persian)
Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K., Kavousi, A., Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, M. and Al Sawaf, M.B. (2020). Influence of suspended sediment concentration and particle sizes on the sound attenuation of the fluvial acoustic tomography technique. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 18(5), 338-348.
Dijkstra, Y.M., Schuttelaars, H.M. and Schramkowski, G.P. (2019). A regime shift from low to high sediment concentrations in a tide‐dominated estuary. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(8), 4338-4345.
Jourdin, F., Tessier, C., Le Hir, P., Verney, R., Lunven, M., Loyer, S., Lusven, A., Filipot, J.F. and Lepesqueur, J. (2014). Dual-frequency ADCPs measuring turbidity. Geo-Marine Letters, 34(4), 381-397.
Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Kaneko, A. and Watanabe, S. (2010). Long-term measurement of stream flow and salinity in a tidal river by the use of the fluvial acoustic tomography system. Journal of Hydrology, 380(1-2), 74-81.
Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Soltaniasl, M. and Kaneko, A. (2011). Long-term salinity measurement in a tidal estuary by the use of acoustic tomography. In: 3rd International Conference & Exhibition on Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results, Greece, pp. 401-408.
Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Ishikawa, K., Yano, J. and Soltaniasl, M. (2012). Continuous measurements of flow rate in a shallow gravel-bed river by a new acoustic system. Water Resources Research, 48(5), 1–10.
Kawanisi, K., Zhu, X.H., Fan, X. and Nistor, I. 2017. Monitoring tidal bores using acoustic tomography system. Journal of Coastal Research, 33(1), 96-104.
Lin, J., Kaneko, A., Gohda, N. and Yamaguchi, K. (2005). Accurate imaging and prediction of Kanmon Strait tidal current structures by the coastal acoustic tomography data. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(14), https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022 914.
Manik, H.M., Gultom, D.A. and Elson, L. (2020). Evaluation of ADCP backscatter computation for quantifying suspended sediment concentration. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 429, 012035, IOP Publishing, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/429/1/012035.
Munk, W. and Wunsch, C. (1979). Ocean acoustic tomography: A scheme for large scale monitoring. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 26(2), 123-161.
Pomázi, F. and Baranya, S. (2020). Comparative assessment of fluvial suspended sediment concentration analysis methods. Water, 12(3), 873, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030873.
Richards, S.D., Heathershaw, A.D. and Thorne, P.D. (1996). The effect of suspended particulate matter on sound attenuation in seawater. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(3), 1447-1450.
Sándor, B. and Józsa, J. (2013). Estimation of suspended sediment concentrations with ADCP in Danube River. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 61(3), 232-240.
Szupiany, R.N., Lopez Weibel, C., Guerrero, M., Latosinski, F., Wood, M., Dominguez Ruben, L. and Oberg, K. (2019). Estimating sand concentrations using ADCP‐based acoustic inversion in a large fluvial system characterized by bi‐modal suspended‐sediment distributions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(6), 1295-1308.
Thomas, L.P., Marino, B.M. and Szupiany, R.N. (2017), July. Application of the two-ADCP technique in estuaries to characterize the suspended particulate matter transport. In 2017 IEEE/OES Acoustics in Underwater Geosciences Symposium (RIO Acoustics), 1-5. IEEE, 10.1109/ RIOAcoustics.2017.8349736
Thorne, P., Vincent, C., Hardcastle, P., Rehman, S. and Pearson, N. (1991). Measuring suspended sediment concentrations using acoustic backscatter devices. Marine Geology, 98(1), 7–16.
Urick, R.J. (1948). The Absorption of Sound in Suspensions of Irregular Particles. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20(3), 283-289.
Urick, R.J. (1983). Principles of underwater sound. Peninsula Pub, New York, USA.
Urick, R.J. (1997). Principles of underwater sound. Los Altos, CA, USA. Peninsula Publishing.
Verstraeten, G., Van Rompaey, A., Poesen, J., Van Oost, K. and Govers, G. (2003). Evaluating the impact of watershed management scenarios on changes in sediment delivery to rivers? In: The interactions between sediments and water, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 153-158.
Yamaguchi, K., Lin, J., Kaneko, A., Yayamoto, T., Gohda, N., Nguyen, H.Q. and Zheng, H. (2005). A continuous mapping of tidal current structures in the kanmon strait. Journal of Oceanography, 61(2), 283–294.