Investigating the effect of rigid non- submerged artificial vegetation on flow characteristics in Compound Meander Channel

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 water department of Ferdowsi university of mashhad

2 Prof., Department of Water Engineering, Agricultural College, ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor , Department of Water Engineering, Agricultural College, ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Rivers can be classified as straight, meandering and braiding, Meandering is the most common plan-form acquired by natural rivers. The meandering channel flow is considerably more complex than the straight channel. Compound meandering channels are abundant in nature that including the main channel for the flow in normal times and one or two floodplain (usually covered with plants) at the sides during floods. Vegetation is an important property of many rivers, enhancing amenity values for people and providing habitat for other organisms. Vegetation stabilizes stream banks, provides shade that performs an essential role in nutrient cycling and water quality and supports wildlife. Therefore, it is necessary to study this issue in order to better understand the flow during floods. This study is focused on the influence of vegetation on overbank flow characteristics. In this research, the effect of non-submerged rigid artificial vegetation in the floodplain on two relative depths of 0.35 and 0.55 has been studied in the laboratory.
Methodology: The experimental research was carried out in a non-mobile bed meandering channel constructed in a 10 m long and 0.78 m wide flume which included the main channel and two floodplains on its sides. The channel wavelength and meander belt width were one meter and 0.58 m, respectively with the sinuosity of 1.3. The geometrical parameters for the main channel were: width, Bmc=0.2 m and depth, Hmc= 0.1 m. Plastic cylinders of 9mm diameter are used to simulate the emergent floodplain vegetation. A movable weir located at downstream of flume controlled water level. Velocity data were extracted and analyzed using Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry. The minimum recording time for each point velocity was 60s. ADV measures the 3D velocities of water particles located 5 cm below its probe. The measurement sections located 6 m downstream of channel inlet, with the names of S1 to S5.
Results and discussion: The results showed that the presence of vegetation in the plain flood for a constant relative depth has reduced the flow capacity. The decrease in discharge for depths of 0.35 and 0.55 is equal to 23 and 12 percent, respectively, for a density of 0.77 percent per unit area of one square meter. The pattern of contour lines of the longitudinal velocity in the main channel in the presence of vegetation changes at both relative flow depths relative to the uncovered state. The absolute values of velocity in the main channel in the uncovered state are greater than in the covered state. Also, the values in the transverse and vertical velocity components in plain floods with vegetation are much higher than in uncovered conditions. The directional secondary vectors of the flow in section S1 indicate a counter-clockwise flow in the main channel. The presence of vegetation at a relative depth of 0.55 has reduced the size and values of these vectors in both the main channel and the floodplain. It seems that the presence of coverage, as observed during the experiments, has changed the patterns and directions of vectors on the floodplain. These changes are also observed at the relative depth of 0.35, but specifically the presence of vegetation at this relative depth has caused the flow transfer from the right floodplain to the left floodplain. For all sections, the average values of longitudinal velocity on both sides of the floodplain are greater than the uncovered state and increase by moving away from the main channel to the glass wall of the channel. Although the capacity of covered flow is less than the uncovered one, flow velocities in and around the main channel seem to be close to those measured in uncovered channel. This indicates the high impact of floodplain vegetation on the hydraulics of the flow in the compound meandering channels. Also, the presence of cylinders has increased turbulence and consequently increased shear stress. The values of shear stress at the bottom of the main channel and the convex coast of the floodplain are higher than other areas. In addition, the cover has increased shear stress in the floodplain and reduced the kinetic energy of turbulence (TKE) in the floodplain.
Conclusion: In this study, using a laboratory model, the effect of non-submerged rigid artificial vegetation on the floodplain of a compound meandering channel was investigated. The following is a summary of the results of this study. The presence of vegetation reduced the water transfer capacity, due to the increased resistance to flow. The average longitudinal velocity of the flow in the cross section of the channel in the uncovered state is higher than in the case with the cover. Due to the non-submerged rigid artificial vegetation used, the shear stress in the floodplain has increased.
Keywords: Flood, Flow Pattern, Meander Channel, Relative Depth, Vegetation

Keywords

References

Afzalimehr, H. and Anctil, F. (2000). Accelerating shear velocity in gravel bed channels. J. Hydrol. Sci., 45, 113-124.
Davidson, P.A. (2004). Turbulence: An introduction for scientists and engineers, Oxford University Press.
Dupuis, V., Proust, S., Berni, C. and Paquier, A. (2017). Mixing layer development in compound channel flows with submerged and emergent rigid vegetation over the floodplains. Experiments in Fluids, 58(4), 30.‏
Goring, D.G. and V. I. Nikora. (2002). Despiking acoustic doppler velocimeter data. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE. 128(1), 117–126. Discussion: 129(6), 484–489.
Güneralp, I., Abad, J.D., Zolezzi, G. and Hooke, J. (2012). Advances and challenges in meandering channels research, Geomorphology, 163, 1-9.
Hagerman, J.R. and Williams, J.D. (2000). Meander Shape and the Design of Stable Meanders. In: Proceedings American Water Resources Association, Specialty Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, April.‏
Hamidifar, H., Omid, M.H. and Keshavarzi, A. (2013). Mean Flow and Turbulence in Compound Channels with Vegetated Floodplains. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 14(3), 51-66. (In Persian)
Hamidifar, H., Omid, M.H. and Keshavarzi, A. (2015). Effect of Floodplain Submerged and Non-submerged Vegetation on the Transverse Mixing Coefficient of Pollutants. Journal of Hydraulics. 10(1), pp. 13-23. (In Persian)
Hooke, J.M. and Yorke, L. (2010). Rates, distributions and mechanisms of change in meander morphology over decadal timescales, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35, 1601–1614
Hosseinzadeh, M.M., Shirud Isa, N. and Esmaili, R. (2018). Undesirable effects of sand and gravel harvesting on river system, Case study: Shirud River Tonekabon (Mazandaran Province). Journal of Earth Science Researches, 9(34), 165-175. (In Persian)
karami moghadam, M. and Sabzevari, T. (2017). Effect of Vegetation on Shear Stress and Flow Velocity in Compound Channels Using Flow3D Model. Journal of Hydraulics, 12(3), 29-40. (In Persian)
KozioĊ‚, A. (2015). Scales of turbulent eddies in a compound channel. Acta Geophysica, 63(2), 514-532.‏
Liu, C., Shan, Y.Q., Yang, K.J. and Liu, X.N. (2013). The characteristics of secondary flows in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 25(3), 422-429.‏
Marjoribanks, T.I., Hardy, R.J., Lane, S.N. and Parsons, D.R. (2017). Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 17(2), 277-301.‏
Nepf, H. (1999). Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research, 35(2), 479–489.
Rajaratnam, N. and Ahmadi, R. (1981). Hydraulics of channels with floodplains. J. Hydraul. Res. 16(2), 139-150.
Sellin, R.H.J., Ervine, D.A., and Willetts, B.B. (1993). Behaviour of meandering two-stage channels. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Maritime and Energy, 101(2), 99-111.‏
Seminara, G. (2006). Meanders, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 554, 271- 297.
Shiono, K. and Knight, D.W. (1991). Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. Journal of fluid Mechanics, 222, 617-646.
Shiono, K. and Muto, Y. (1998). Complex flow mechanisms in compound meandering channels with overbank flow. Journal of fluid Mechanics, 376, 221-261.‏
Shiono, K., Chan, T.L., Spooner, J., Rameshwaran, P. and Chandler, J.H. (2009). The effect of floodplain roughness on flow structures, bedforms and sediment transport rates in meandering channels with overbank flows: Part I. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 47(1), 5-19.‏‏
Tominaga, A. and Nezu, I. (1991). Turbulent structure in compound open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(1), 21-41.
Tominaga, A., Nezu, I., Ezaki, K. and Nakagawa, H. (1989). Three-dimensional turbulent structure in straight open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic research, 27(1), 149-173
Wahl, T.L. (2000). Analyzing ADV data using WinADV, ASCE Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, July 30-August 2.
White, B.L. and H.N. Nepf. (2007). Shear instability and coherent structures in shallow flow adjacent to a porous layer. Fluid Mech. 593, 1–32.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 May 2020
  • Revise Date: 30 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 04 July 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics